Free the People: Chris Anderson at O’Reilly TOC
Chris Anderson spoke this morning as part of the opening keynote sessions during the first day of the inaugural O’Reilly “Tools of Change” conference, taking place this week in San Jose. His talk was entitled “FREE: The Economics of Abundance and the Price of Zero,” which is also the subject of his next book. The session was just a speech, with Anderson announcing somewhat nervously at the beginning that he was not going to have an accompanying PowerPoint presentation. This was quickly greeted by laughter and applause. Anderson began by saying that there’s really nothing new about the idea of giving things away for free, and went on to cite many different kinds of economies where things — goods or effort or ideas — are given away for free. The one that really struck me was what Anderson called the “gift economy,” citing Wikipedia as the best example. These are social networking and user-generated content sites where people spend a lot of time and effort creating content, receiving for this not necessarily money but instead they get reputation and the ability to express themselves. In these situations economics as we know it (people paying for a good or service) do not apply. And then, placing his speech in context when talking about what’s happening to other media (including music and film), Anderson stated that “books are the last media not approaching free.”
In terms of ways that he’s going to use “free” to electronically promote his upcoming book (which will come out around the end of 2008), Anderson cited the following examples that he and his publisher are considering:
1. Make the audio book free with the purchase of the printed book. The buyer of the printed book would receive a code that would allow them to download an MP3 of the audio book (for free). However, the audio book would also be sold as a standalone item.
2. Book would included in all search programs, including Google.
3. eBook would be given way for free, but locked to a specific device/reader. This would allow it to be spread to early adopters and “influentials,” treating them as a “marketing channel.”
4. An unlocked eBook edition that features ads alongside the text (which is much like how magazines look, where content is next to advertising).
5. Page-view model, where users would read it online, with ads that make sense.
6. Sample chapters distributed on websites.
In terms of the analog version of his “free” idea, Anderson mentioned the following methods that could be used in terms of making print books available.
1. Sponsored books.
2. Advertising in books.
3. Rebate model; offer rebates to people who buy the book.
4. Give away books to “influentials.” (This worked incredibly well for The Long Tail, where Anderson convinced his publisher to print 1,000 ARCs — many more than publishers usually print — and they ended up getting about 800 copies into the hands of interested bloggers. From this, more than 600 online reviews appeared, which then linked to Amazon. Anderson said that his Amazon sales outweighed his bookstore sales, leading him and his publishes to believe that all of that online-linking led to more Internet/Amazon sales.)
5. Libraries, where books have always been free.
But why do all of this? Anderson said that, in this model, the “free book is the marketing for the non-book thing.” In his case, what he’s really selling is himself. He also acknowledged that, for his publisher, this is a difficult and different proposition. But Anderson believes that “you give away what you can give away, and you charge what you can charge for,” and that all of the iterations of the eBook or the printed book with ads — that any way you offer the “free” version — will be inferior to the real book.
So the real reason for all of this is to generate and maximize exposure. Anderson cited that 200,000 books are published a year, but only 20,000 make money. Because of this, Anderson believes that authors write to be read. So then writers can create audiences by making their material free. Of course, the question then becomes, How does this make money? Because these ideas don’t work for all books, and in the case of most authors, they make their money from royalties (the same way publishers make their money from sales). Anderson mentioned the inevitable publisher opposition to some of his ideas. However, he also stressed that, in an increasingly digital world, traditional publishers need to find a way to play a part in the growing community aspects that are currently growing around books.
In terms of the “print is dead” debate, Anderson was not as forward thinking. He said that the printed book is still “the optimal way to read the book,” stating flatly that the “physical product is better than the digital book.” As I mentioned in the blog post about Edward Tenner’s article a few months ago, this reminds me of the paraphrased chant at the end of Animal Farm: “Digital books good, printed books better!” Anderson also said, tongue somewhat in check, that “the only thing that comes close to the book is a glossy magazine.” (He is, after all the editor of Wired.) In the face of digital music, and the online streaming or outright downloading of movies and TV shows, he also said “books are the last physical commodity that makes sense.” He also said that books were the last item opposing the “relentless march” towards digitization. The way he said this made it sound as if he approves of the book’s continued resistance in the face of digital challenges. He expounded on this during the Q&A session following the keynotes, when an audience member asked Anderson if he felt he had been “too harsh” in his dismissal of eBooks. Anderson hesitated a bit, but then answered that his views on eBooks versus printed books are based mainly on the emotional aspect of books and not necessarily their utility.
Finally, in terms of his admittedly radical idea of giving things away for “free,” Anderson stated that “there are a lot of risks, but eventually things work themselves out.”
7 Comments so far
Leave a reply











Hi Jeff - I’ve just discovered your blog an it looks great. I’m looking forward to reading the archives!
Although I’m really interested in Chris Anderson’s ideas, some of his argument (at least as you report it) seems a little flawed. (I do work in publishing so perhaps it is inevitable I don’t agree with him!)
I don’t think books ARE the last media not approaching free do you? Downloading music and movies for free is still largely illegal, so if you follow this logic, I’d have to point out that stealing books is free too and, as former bookseller, I can tell you that s@#t happens ALL THE TIME! People also share books. A LOT.
Anderson maybe tacitly saying he doesn’t agree with the current laws regarding downloads, but that is a different issue no?
Also if you look at TV, people still have to subscribe to cable. That’s not free either. HBO survives, in part, because people are still willing to pay for it.
Wikipedia and social networking are all good free things, but aren’t they are different from the media/stuff we pay for? Free stuff has always lived side-by-side with non-free stuff. I’m not sure how this is different…
Anyway, I could go on and on about this, (especially as many of the ideas Anderson is suggesting for his own book sound like things publishers do already for other less zeitgeisty books e.g. in the context of his argument, how is giving ‘influencers’ an e-book for free different from giving them an advance reading copy for free?), but you might like to check out a conversation me and my friend Monique were having about some of these issues on her blog www.somisguided.com
Cheers
Interesting that for all this talk of “free,” especially in the trendy-electronic-online-Internet sense, publishing the text in the freest way of all — ie, open-sourcing the entire book with a true copyleft license on the source files — isn’t even an option under consideration here.
I mean, “eBook would be given way for free, but locked to a specific device/reader,” “Sample chapters distributed on websites” — this is so unbelievable, repudiated by the free-book “innovators” and “early adopters” over ten years ago … it sounds like what Anderson wants to do is use the net for “free” advertising for his non-free book, whose subject happens to be about how all this technology makes us “free” …
What’s also interesting about all this is what Chris Smythe at Simon & Schuster mentioned to me after Anderson’s talk: that Anderson is espousing the idea of “free” as a concept in his new book, yet he “freely” admits that his book is really just a marketing tool to grow his celebrity, which then leads to non-free (and very expensive) speaking engagements.
[…] Is Dead has a wonderful report on the O’Reilly Tools of Change address by Chris Anderson that contains some sage advice on the power of free content to sell hard copy […]
[…] Commenting on an interesting post - I do this a lot, especially when I find posts that I can recommend like Jeri’s, Solomon’s, and this one from Print is Dead. […]
[…] Commenting on an interesting post - I do this a lot, especially when I find posts that I can recommend like Jeri’s, Solomon’s, and this one from Print is Dead. […]
I heard him talk about this in Britain recently, and I was very struck by what he said @ music. At least for the large, well-known bands like the Rolling Stones, U2, & Prince (his examples), music purchase is a very minor (5%?) percent of their profits. They really make their $$ through concert tickets, where people pay for the commodity of listening to the band live. He thus suggests that recorded music should be free as incentive to get folks to go to concerts.
Interesting ideas.